Featured Post

Now Available: The Brutal Blade of Bruno the Bandit Vol. 6!

Brutal Blade Vol. 6 is live and on the air! With this book, we reach the midpoint of the Bruno the Bandit archives, and also reach a turni...

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Lessons Learned in Self-Publishing: Be Careful What You Wish For

In my opinion, the next best thing to a sale is a review.  I'm always happy to send out a review copy to anyone who writes for a public forum and is interested in reviewing one of the books I publish.  Even better when a reader takes the time, unbidden, to write some helpful comments about something they've read.
So, I was briefly thrilled to check my email this morning and find that someone had both read and reviewed my new book, "The Journals of Simon Pariah" on DriveThruComics.

Very briefly.

Apparently this reviewer was less than thrilled with my book, rating it a mere two stars, an adding the following comments:

"I felt like I had been misled based on what I had read in the description. I thought I would be reading original ideas using past events/figures both real and imagined. This story was basically a retelling of RE Howard's "The Thing in the Crypt" featuring Conan the Barbarian. The author freely admits after the tale his character was inspired by Howard's creations as well as another sword/sorcery author.
The art was good and supported the story but I found the illustration of Wolverine to be unnecessary and detrimental to the feeling of the time period the author was trying to create.

The text could have benefited from a good proofreading. There are numerous grammatical mistakes in punctuation and spelling that could have been caught.

I did like the format. I like comics that are text heavy with fewer illustrations allowing for better fleshed out storytelling.

All in all this might not have been the strongest issue to start the series. Perhaps it might have worked better as a flashback."


 Ouch!

What I'd like to do is go through this review point by point, constructing a good argument to explain how this reader has misunderstood the book, and how what he sees as flaws are the same things I consider strengths.

I'd like to do that, but I won't.

I won't do it because there's nothing to be gained by it.  If I respond to every bit of negative criticism, I'm only going to make myself look worse, and not add anything productive to the conversation.
I also think that no matter how good an argument I construct, I won't change this reader's mind...he's read the book and formed his opinion, and that's that.  Better luck next time.
I won't do it because I think he's right.  At least insofar as to say that his criticism is as valid as anyone's, and whether I agree with him or not, he's got every right to express it.
Finally, and most importantly, I appreciate that this reader took the time to write this review and let me know what he thinks.  It's well written and attempts to be constructive, and balanced with some positive commentary as well.  Whether he enjoyed the book or not, at least he took the time to respond to it, and give me something I can learn from and, hopefully, grow on.  That's worth a lot to me.

The lesson is, if you're looking to get into self-publishing, you'd better grow a thick skin when it comes to reviews.  Not everyone is going to praise your efforts, and people will more quickly jump on the keyboard when they've got something negative to say.  Don't turn every bad review into an argument or it will only weaken you in the eyes of your readership.  Instead, try to appreciate the feedback, learn something from the comments and move on.  That's just one of the ways you grow as a creator.

In the meantime, why don't you try the book for yourself and tell me if you agree with this review?  If you're a blogger/reviewer/journalist, contact me and let me know where you'll be writing your review, and I'll set you up with a comp copy of the book.  Everyone else can grab a copy for under a buck over at DriveThru Comics and then join in the conversation.


4 comments:

Mikeyboy said...

Everyone is a critic...pfft...Hey what did you think of BLOD?

Is that statue on the cover " Ugliano and his sons?"

Anonymous said...

Who gives a shit what that guy thinks? I bet he loves 'twilight' and '50 shades of grey.'

I like Bruno the Bandit, it is a parody of all things fantasy and includes modern life problems, like living with your parents, religious fanatics, war, criminals, good vs evil and so on.

I look forward to seeing the rest of the Ambrose story...will Bruno escape from prison, who knows, so come one Ian, let's see more of Bruno!

Dominic said...

Mikeyboy....I've got no problem with critics. They're what help you improve. I haven't been able to read "Blod" yet, or you'd have seen a review here. I tried contacting IndyPlanet about the problem, and their answer was, in short, "Meh. Must be your fault.".
The statue is the Laocoon, used here to symbolize the necessary conflict between the old and the new, one of the themes of the first issue.

Anonymous...Thanks, but this is not a Bruno the Bandit book. Nevertheless, I invite you to check it out. It's got a more serious tone, but if you enjoy a good REH pastice, I think you'll like this one.

And I care what that guy thinks...as I mentioned, I think his comments were well written and constructive, and I'd never knock anyone for sharing an honest opinion.

Anonymous said...

Ahhh, I see what you mean now. Sorry, my mistake.

As for the book, I'll have to check it out.